Patent Disputes and Article 24 of Judicial Interpretation II

作者/编者:Li Zhongsheng
作者单位:金杜律师事务所
创作年代:2017
出处/来源:金杜律师事务所
学科分类:知识产权法学
所属机构:金杜律师事务所
文献语种:

摘要

On behalf of Qualcomm Incorporated, King & Wood Mallesons recently asserted several standard essential patents (SEPs) against Meizu, a Zhuhai-based handset manufacturer. Meizu concluded a license agreement with Qualcomm on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms, in settlement of the royalty dispute after it was threatened with an injunction. Article 24 of the Supreme People’s Court Interpretation of Issues of Application of Laws in the Handling of Patent Infringement Disputes (II) was the legal basis on which Qualcomm accused Meizu of patent infringement. Since judicial interpretations merely guide the application of laws and regulations the courts will not make decisions that conflict with legislation. Hence paragraph 4, which provides that where laws or regulations otherwise stipulate the role of any patent in a standard, such laws or regulations shall prevail. This essay is a preliminary consideration of that article.

关键词: Qualcomm; Meizu; Patent Disputes; Article 24 of Judicial Interpretation

正文

备注

本文献PDF共计6页,免费分享。

为你推荐RECOMMEND

收藏
翻译服务
下 载

该文档为付费内容,请购买后阅读全文

翻译服务

Patent Disputes and Article 24 of Judicial Interpretation II

我们提供文献翻译服务,请填写您的联系方式,方便我们与您取得联系

提交
客服热线:13801067850 座机:010-88578296

提交成功

我们会在3个工作日内与您取得联系,请保持手机联系方式畅通