A new ground to defend bad faith trademark registration – CNIPA rules that new trademark application should reasonably yield to prior trademark right if the applicant has full awareness of other’s prior trademark
|作者/编者：||Ding Xianjie King and Wood Mallesons’ IP group||作者单位：||金杜律师事务所|
Trademark squatting has been a common occurrence in China for many years, and even been a kind of “business” by trademark squatters, which has caused huge troubles to brand owners. It is not the case, as ordinary people might think, that all types of trademark squatting can be regulated by the explicit provisions of existing laws, otherwise the phenomenon would not be so difficult to eradicate. Recently, the Trademark Review Department of the China National Intellectual Property Administration(CNIPA) held, in the “Decision on the Request for Invalidation Declaration of the “LOVESAC” Trademark under No. 17962803″ and the “Decision on the Request for Invalidation Declaration of the “LOVESAC” Trademark under No. 17962891″, that the registrant of the disputed trademark, knowing the existence of the applicant’s trademark, should reasonably avoid applying for this mark, and thus supported the brand owner’s request for invalidation of the trademark registrations of the squatter, even the goods or services are dissimilar. We understands that this view and the application of the law reflects the strengthening of the current efforts to combat trademark squatting. This article stress the principle of good faith, which is stipulated in the Article 7 of Trademark Law, should be obeyed in trademark registration. In the actual cases, however, the provision of this article is often regarded as a principle clause and not directly applied. By contrast, it is indirectly applied by the application of Article 44.1 of the Trademark Law.
|文章标题||A new ground to defend bad faith trademark registration – CNIPA rules that new trademark application should reasonably yield to prior trademark right if the applicant has full awareness of other’s prior trademark|
- ·A new ground to defend bad faith trademark registration – CNIPA rules that new trademark application should reasonably yield to prior trademark right if the applicant has full awareness of other’s prior trademark
- ·“Good faith” to deter opportunistic trademark litigation——How to Deal with Abusive Trademark Litigation
- ·New Facilitation Measures for Trademark Registration
- ·1st Civil Case Recognizing Well-known Trademark on Similar Goods
- ·Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
- ·China year in review –Where we have been and where we are going?
- ·A Global Perspective: Do Parallel Imports Constitute Trademark Infringement?
- ·How to Handle Complex Disputes Between Registered Trademark and Well-known Trademark in China?
- ·2017 Typical Trademark Cases Released by the Supreme People’s Court of P.R.C
- ·China’s M.I.I.T. Proposes Broad Regulatory Oversight over Pre-Installed Mobile Phone/Device Applications
- ·Hong Kong’s competition law now in force – Tips for financial institutions
- ·Hong Kong Competition Commission’s enforcement and leniency policies
- ·A new cross border financing management regime implemented in China’s four free trade zones
- ·First Boycott Decision: Be Careful with Concerted Exclusive Dealing
- ·The Antitrust Safe Harbor for Exercising IPRs: More Details are Needed for its Scope, Thresholds and Compatibility
- ·Qualified foreign institutional investors investing in China’s Inter-bank Bond Market are no longer subject to approval and quota restrictions
- ·Highlights of Recent Legislation in connection with China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- ·What has been “Changed” and “Unchanged” for the foreign investments in online publishing? -- A capsule review on the online publishing service rules
- ·The Employment of “Elderly” Foreigners in China: Service or Employment?