New Approach for Similarity Judgment of Cross-class Goods

作者/编者:Cissy Zhou and Cai Chongshan
作者单位:金杜律师事务所
创作年代:2020
出处/来源:金杜律师事务所
学科分类:知识产权法学
所属机构:金杜律师事务所
文献语种:

摘要

Recently, the China National Intellectual Property Administration decided that the disputed trademark designated on “shower caps” and the citations designated on “clothing; shoes; hats; hosiery; gloves (clothing); scarves; belts (clothing); down garments; leather belts (clothing); fur coat (clothing)” goods as similar trademarks on similar goods that would cause consumer confusion. Finally, the disputed trademark is determined to be invalidated in the “No. 20148247 ‘地素佳人’ (“DI SU JIA REN” in Chinese Characters) trademark invalidation ruling. This case is a typical example that breaks the Classification Book and provides a new approach to prove bad faith of the trademark applicant.“The intention of confusion” is a strong evidence to claim breaking through the Classification Book and prove the constitution of “similar goods” regulated in accordance with Article 30 of Trademark Law. The goods that has been refused at the stage of examination can be used to deduce the applicant was in bad faith with the “intention of confusion”.

关键词: Cross-class Goods; Similarity Judgment; DI SU JIA REN

正文

备注

本文献PDF共计5页,免费分享。如有任何问题,请联系editor@wells.org.cn。

为你推荐RECOMMEND

收藏
翻译服务
下 载

该文档为付费内容,请购买后阅读全文

翻译服务

New Approach for Similarity Judgment of Cross-class Goods

我们提供文献翻译服务,请填写您的联系方式,方便我们与您取得联系

提交
客服热线:13801067850 座机:010-88578296

提交成功

我们会在3个工作日内与您取得联系,请保持手机联系方式畅通