The Employment of “Elderly” Foreigners in China: Service or Employment?
|作者/编者：||Jiang Junlu(Partner), Luo Kaitian (Associate)||作者单位：||金杜律师事务所|
With the development of Chinese economy, more and more foreigners are being employed in China, among which there is a group of “Laowai” who has already reached or even passed the Chinese statutory retirement age (the “Elderly Foreigners”). The Elderly Foreigners are not like their Chinese fellows who are retired completely at the age of 55 or 60, but still being active at their jobs or even acting as middle-level and high-level managers or technicians in many companies. The question is, whether the employment form of the Elderly Foreigners is service or employment under Chinese law? The Regulations on the Management of the Employment of Foreigners in China provides that in China, the minimum employment age for a foreigner is 18, but there is no explicit provision to specify whether they shall be bound by requirements of the Chinese statutory retirement age. In some regions such as Beijing and Shanghai, local regulations stipulate that the upper age limit is 60 or, 60 for male and 55 for female. However, these local regulations do not provide a clear instruction on the foreigners’ statutory retirement age in China and, at the same time, allow the liberation of the aforesaid age requirements for talents urgently needed. Thus, does it mean that the Elderly Foreigners in China are not legally required to retire?To crack the puzzle, this article deals with a research on several cases through public resources available and realized that the answers of local courts in various regions are not the same.
|文章标题||The Employment of “Elderly” Foreigners in China: Service or Employment?|
- ·The Employment of “Elderly” Foreigners in China: Service or Employment?
- ·Interregional Employment: Challenges revealed to“Social Insurance Paid Through a Third party”
- ·Case Analysis of Labor Disputes on Foreign Employment
- ·How change of address affects employment relationship
- ·Suggestions on Employers’ Prudence about “Deemed as Voluntary Quit” Regulation
- ·Employers Liability For Withholding Severance Of Employment Certificates
- ·Summary of Beijing’s Answers to Questions About the Application of Law in Adjudication of Employment Disputes (Part Three)
- ·Summary of Beijing Authorities’ Answers to Questions of Law Application in the Handling of Employment Disputes (Part Two)
- ·Employers: Be Cautious with Pay Cuts
- ·China’s M.I.I.T. Proposes Broad Regulatory Oversight over Pre-Installed Mobile Phone/Device Applications
- ·Hong Kong’s competition law now in force – Tips for financial institutions
- ·Hong Kong Competition Commission’s enforcement and leniency policies
- ·A new cross border financing management regime implemented in China’s four free trade zones
- ·First Boycott Decision: Be Careful with Concerted Exclusive Dealing
- ·The Antitrust Safe Harbor for Exercising IPRs: More Details are Needed for its Scope, Thresholds and Compatibility
- ·Qualified foreign institutional investors investing in China’s Inter-bank Bond Market are no longer subject to approval and quota restrictions
- ·Highlights of Recent Legislation in connection with China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- ·What has been “Changed” and “Unchanged” for the foreign investments in online publishing? -- A capsule review on the online publishing service rules
- ·Joint ventures under Hong Kong’s competition law: Compliance tips