“Good faith” to deter opportunistic trademark litigation——How to Deal with Abusive Trademark Litigation
|作者/编者：||He Wei(partner), Wang Yaxi(associate)||作者单位：||金杜律师事务所|
The principle of good faith applies not only to the manner in which trademark rights are obtained, but also to the manner in which those rights are enforced through litigation. Trademarks may generate steady income for trademark holders due to the long life span of trademark rights and the increasing value of the rights when the mark becomes recognized by the market through continuous use. However, registering or otherwise obtaining trademark rights solely in order to profit from litigation or to eliminate competition in a market may constitute an abuse of power or contravene the principle of good faith, and this may well impact on the compensation that a Court is prepared to award for acts that would otherwise constitute trademark infringement. This article discusses the prevailing trends of the Supreme Court in dealing with abusive trademark litigation with the ‘‘Qisehua’’ case.
|文章标题||“Good faith” to deter opportunistic trademark litigation——How to Deal with Abusive Trademark Litigation|
- ·“Good faith” to deter opportunistic trademark litigation——How to Deal with Abusive Trademark Litigation
- ·How to Handle Complex Disputes Between Registered Trademark and Well-known Trademark in China?
- ·2017 Typical Trademark Cases Released by the Supreme People’s Court of P.R.C
- ·Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
- ·An Analysis of the SPC Judgment on PRETUL
- ·1st Civil Case Recognizing Well-known Trademark on Similar Goods
- ·A new ground to defend bad faith trademark registration – CNIPA rules that new trademark application should reasonably yield to prior trademark right if the applicant has full awareness of other’s prior trademark
- ·Principles for Determining Damages Compensation in Intellectual Property Cases
- ·Investing in Russia? – Lessons learnt from the Yukos and Sanum Cases
- ·China’s M.I.I.T. Proposes Broad Regulatory Oversight over Pre-Installed Mobile Phone/Device Applications
- ·Hong Kong’s competition law now in force – Tips for financial institutions
- ·Hong Kong Competition Commission’s enforcement and leniency policies
- ·A new cross border financing management regime implemented in China’s four free trade zones
- ·First Boycott Decision: Be Careful with Concerted Exclusive Dealing
- ·The Antitrust Safe Harbor for Exercising IPRs: More Details are Needed for its Scope, Thresholds and Compatibility
- ·Qualified foreign institutional investors investing in China’s Inter-bank Bond Market are no longer subject to approval and quota restrictions
- ·Highlights of Recent Legislation in connection with China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- ·What has been “Changed” and “Unchanged” for the foreign investments in online publishing? -- A capsule review on the online publishing service rules
- ·The Employment of “Elderly” Foreigners in China: Service or Employment?