Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
| 作者/编者： | Meg Utterback, Tara J. Plochocki | 作者单位： | 金杜律师事务所 |
| 学科分类： | 国际商事与投资争端解决 | 类型分类： | 综合 |
| 创作年代： | 2016 | 所属机构： | 金杜律师事务所 |
| 出处/来源： | 金杜律师事务所 | 文献语种： | 英文 |
| 发布时间： | 2021-01-21 09:49:17 | ||
| 外部链接： | https://www.kwm.com/en/cn/knowledge/insights/chinese-banks-increasingly-subject-to-us-jurisdiction-20160829 | ||
摘要/简介Abstract
In 2010 and 2011, the New York branch of the Bank of China (“BOC”)was served with two subpoenas relating to a lawsuit for trademark infringement brought by luxury goods companies Gucci, Balenciaga, Yves Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta and others. They sought all documents – including those located in China – relating to BOC accounts belonging to the defendant counterfeiters. BOC protested that compliance with these requests would cause it to violate Chinese law protecting bank customers from unauthorized disclosure of their account information. Last month, BOC’s five-year battle to maintain its customers’ privacy and remain in compliance with Chinese law came to an end. In that time, BOC filed two appeals, was found in contempt of court twice, and filed its own lawsuit in China. The Gucci case offers some insight as to what to expect from U.S. courts going forward. It appears probable that U.S. courts will continue to demand the production of information protected from disclosure outside the U.S., and will assert jurisdiction when lawsuits or subpoenas relate to an entity’s deliberate use of a U.S. correspondent bank account.
备注
本文献PDF共计6页，免费分享。
文献纠错
| 文章标题 | Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton |
| 错误内容 | |
| 正确说法 | |
| 提交 |
-
5分
共有0人评价过此文献,平均分为0分
最相关
- ·Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
- ·An Analysis of the SPC Judgment on PRETUL
- ·Experience: A Patent Infringement Litigation in China
- ·Case report: How such a concealed infringement of UnionPay’s intellectual property was brought to justice in China?
- ·How to Handle Complex Disputes Between Registered Trademark and Well-known Trademark in China?
- ·A Global Perspective: Do Parallel Imports Constitute Trademark Infringement?
- ·1st Civil Case Recognizing Well-known Trademark on Similar Goods
- ·New Facilitation Measures for Trademark Registration
- ·A Case Study of VON DUTCH (Ⅱ)
同作者
同机构
- ·Hong Kong’s competition law now in force – Tips for financial institutions
- ·Hong Kong Competition Commission’s enforcement and leniency policies
- ·A new cross border financing management regime implemented in China’s four free trade zones
- ·First Boycott Decision: Be Careful with Concerted Exclusive Dealing
- ·The Antitrust Safe Harbor for Exercising IPRs: More Details are Needed for its Scope, Thresholds and Compatibility
- ·Qualified foreign institutional investors investing in China’s Inter-bank Bond Market are no longer subject to approval and quota restrictions
- ·Highlights of Recent Legislation in connection with China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- ·What has been “Changed” and “Unchanged” for the foreign investments in online publishing? -- A capsule review on the online publishing service rules
- ·The Employment of “Elderly” Foreigners in China: Service or Employment?
- ·Joint ventures under Hong Kong’s competition law: Compliance tips
京公网安备 11010802021363号