Case study: Belt and Road disputes – Choosing Hong Kong as the seat of arbitration
| 作者/编者： | Paul Starr, James McKenzie, Suraj Sajnani | 作者单位： | 金杜律师事务所 |
| 学科分类： | 国际商事与投资争端解决 | 类型分类： | 综合 |
| 创作年代： | 2016 | 所属机构： | 金杜律师事务所 |
| 出处/来源： | 金杜律师事务所 | 文献语种： | 英文 |
| 发布时间： | 2021-01-12 07:34:10 | ||
| 外部链接： | https://www.kwm.com/en/knowledge/insights/belt-and-road-disputes-choosing-hong-kong-as-the-seat-of-arbitration-20161118 | ||
摘要/简介Abstract
China’s Belt and Road initiative brings new investment opportunities but also an increased need for careful risk management. Prior to entering into any investments, it is important for contracting parties to consider their dispute resolution options and to ensure these are properly reflected in the contracts. Arbitration has advantages over litigation, particularly when the courts closest to an investment are in countries where investors may be less familiar with the legal system. This case study discusses the advantages of opting for a Hong Kong seated arbitration. Confidentiality protections provided for by Hong Kong arbitration law and the near-global mutual enforcement of arbitral awards are key benefits for contracting parties. Parties choosing Hong Kong can also benefit from a comprehensive platform catered for Belt and Road. As Hong Kong positions itself as an infrastructure hub, institutions such as the Infrastructure Financing Facilitation Office have been exploring opportunities to provide support to investors in their Belt and Road investments.
备注
本文献PDF共计6页，免费分享。
文献纠错
| 文章标题 | Case study: Belt and Road disputes – Choosing Hong Kong as the seat of arbitration |
| 错误内容 | |
| 正确说法 | |
| 提交 |
-
5分
共有0人评价过此文献,平均分为0分
最相关
- ·Case study: Belt and Road disputes – Choosing Hong Kong as the seat of arbitration
- ·Managing Risk along the Belt and Road of Opportunity
- ·Breaking down non-tariff barriers in the international trade of agrifood
- ·Administrative Law on Overseas NGOs: A Survival Guide for Overseas NGOs in China SHORT TITLE
- ·What a Negative List!
- ·Latest Judicial Guidance on Labor Disputes in Zhejiang Province
- ·Qualified foreign institutional investors investing in China’s Inter-bank Bond Market are no longer subject to approval and quota restrictions
- ·One Arrangement
- ·The Drug Marketing Authorization Holder Mechanism: Moving Forward through Exploration
同作者
同机构
- ·China’s M.I.I.T. Proposes Broad Regulatory Oversight over Pre-Installed Mobile Phone/Device Applications
- ·Hong Kong’s competition law now in force – Tips for financial institutions
- ·Hong Kong Competition Commission’s enforcement and leniency policies
- ·A new cross border financing management regime implemented in China’s four free trade zones
- ·First Boycott Decision: Be Careful with Concerted Exclusive Dealing
- ·The Antitrust Safe Harbor for Exercising IPRs: More Details are Needed for its Scope, Thresholds and Compatibility
- ·Qualified foreign institutional investors investing in China’s Inter-bank Bond Market are no longer subject to approval and quota restrictions
- ·Highlights of Recent Legislation in connection with China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- ·What has been “Changed” and “Unchanged” for the foreign investments in online publishing? -- A capsule review on the online publishing service rules
- ·The Employment of “Elderly” Foreigners in China: Service or Employment?
京公网安备 11010802021363号