分类导航

    • 杨国华
    • 李目臣
    • 唐纳德·特朗普
    • WELLS编辑部
    • 中国国际刑法青年学者联盟
    • 更多...

      选择作者

      • 拼音索引
      热门 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
    • 国际经济法学
    • 经济法学
    • 国际公法学
    • 商法学
    • 知识产权法学
    • 更多...

      选择学科

      • 拼音索引
      热门 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 更多...

      选择年代

浏览排行

下载排行

收藏排行

总访问量:1019207

An Analysis of the SPC Judgment on PRETUL

收藏  纠错 浏览次数(83次)
字体大小:
作者/编者: Lou Xianying(Cecilia)(partner), Sun Haoguang(senior associate), Yuan Jiaqi(intern, resigned) 作者单位: 金杜律师事务所
学科分类: 民事诉讼法与仲裁法学 类型分类: 综合
创作年代: 2016 所属机构: 金杜律师事务所
出处/来源: 金杜律师事务所 文献语种: 英文
发布时间: 2021-01-12 07:29:34
外部链接: https://www.kwm.com/en/cn/knowledge/insights/an-analysis-of-the-spc-judgment-on-pretul-20161214

摘要/简介Abstract

Since the Supreme People's Court (the “SPC”) handed down its retrial judgment (2014) Civil Retrial No. 38 on the “PRETUL Case”, the question of whether the use of a trademark on an OEM product constitutes infringement has arisen as a topic of heated debate in 2016. Although the SPC gave an answer to this particular case, it did not provide explanations on other subsequent questions, which are now facing people concerned. This article aims to address these questions by analyzing the SPC’s judgment on PRETUL and two similar cases handled by the Beijing IP Court.

备注

本文献PDF共计6页,免费分享。

  • An Analysis of the SPC Judgment on PRETUL - 附件1
    287.81 KB
    马上下载

文献纠错

文章标题 An Analysis of the SPC Judgment on PRETUL
错误内容
正确说法
  提交
文献星级
  • 5分 共有0人评价过此文献,平均分为0

同作者

收藏信息