Crossing Borders丨Civil liability of arbitrators
|作者/编者：||Alfredo Guerrero and Fernando Badenes||作者单位：||金杜律师事务所|
Article 21 of the Spanish Arbitration Act (AA), governing the civil liability of arbitrators, has been receiving considerable attention since early 2017 as a result of the Supreme Court Judgment 102/2017 of the civil liability suit fled by PUMA SE.The aforementioned Article 21.1 of the AA significantly reformed Article 16.1 of the former AA of 1988, which had provided that arbitrators could be held liable for damages caused by negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of their duties in arbitration proceedings. The introduction of this new provision limited their liability to cases involving “bad faith, recklessness or negligence”. The motivation behind this reform was to avoid the previous exorbitant liability system, based on any type of fault which could in practice result in a situation with a real effect on the impartiality and independence of the arbitrators or even in arbitrators refusing to accept arbitrations for fear of becoming the target of such broad liability. The ultimate aim of this reform was to codify the concept of “freedom to judge”, enshrined in the principle of “immunity” as existing in Anglo-Saxon legislation, and which solely allowed for liability in those cases in which the conduct of the arbitrators was guided by willful misconduct or inexcusable negligence.
|文章标题||Crossing Borders丨Civil liability of arbitrators|
- ·Crossing Borders丨Civil liability of arbitrators
- ·China year in review –Where we have been and where we are going?
- ·Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
- ·An Analysis of the SPC Judgment on PRETUL
- ·Invocation of Presumptions and Burden of Proof in Patent Disputes over Manufacturing Processes
- ·Blockchain Legislation丨Increased Accountability: Supervision and Legal Risks of an Initial Coin Offering
- ·Investing in Russia? – Lessons learnt from the Yukos and Sanum Cases
- ·How to Handle Complex Disputes Between Registered Trademark and Well-known Trademark in China?
- ·A new ground to defend bad faith trademark registration – CNIPA rules that new trademark application should reasonably yield to prior trademark right if the applicant has full awareness of other’s prior trademark
- ·“Keep Calm and Carry On”: Keeping up with China’s changing rules for cross-border e-commerce
- ·On the way to or back from work. Work-related injury?
- ·Companies Engaged in Different Business Could be Competitors under the Anti-Unfair Competition Law
- ·Administrative Law on Overseas NGOs: A Survival Guide for Overseas NGOs in China SHORT TITLE
- ·Interpretation of the New Rules on Work-Related Injury Insurance
- ·Case Study: Whether employers and employees could stipulate a nationwide location of work?
- ·Why settle for less? FCA and PRA consult on changes to the enforcement process
- ·Exporters of the World Rejoice – PRC Customs issues e-commerce reprieve
- ·Does the 24-month Medical Treatment Period Apply Directly to Employees?
- ·Breaking down non-tariff barriers in the international trade of agrifood