New Amendments of Chinese Trademark Law will Provide Stronger Protection to Trademark Owner in Good Faith
| 作者/编者： | Ding Xianjie | 作者单位： | 金杜律师事务所 |
| 学科分类： | 知识产权法学 | 类型分类： | 综合 |
| 创作年代： | 2019 | 所属机构： | 金杜律师事务所 |
| 出处/来源： | 金杜律师事务所 | 文献语种： | 英文 |
| 发布时间： | 2020-11-04 11:56:00 | ||
| 外部链接： | https://www.chinalawinsight.com/2019/05/articles/intellectual-property/new-amendments-of-chinese-trademark-law-will-provide-stronger-protection-to-trademark-owner-in-good-faith/# | ||
摘要/简介Abstract
Approved and announced by the Standing Committee of National People’s Congress on April 23, 2019, new amendments of Chinese Trademark Law become effective on November 1, 2019. Focusing on the attempts to stop trademark squatters and trademark infringement, six articles of the current Trademark Law are amended. According to the amendments, any trademark applications which are filed in bad faith for purpose other than use should be rejected (Article 4). Accordingly, any such application can be opposed by anyone within opposition period (Article 33), or can be invalidated after its registration (Article 44), and administrative warning and/or penalty may be issued for such kind of bad faith applications (Article 68). Furthermore, any trademark agencies shall not accept the entrustments from the applicants of such applications (Article 19). The new amendments will provide stronger protection to the trademark owners in good faith. Said new amendments will take effect from November 1, 2019, but the rejection of applications which are obviously filed by trademark squatters seems having already been started.
备注
本文献PDF共计2页，免费分享。
文献纠错
| 文章标题 | New Amendments of Chinese Trademark Law will Provide Stronger Protection to Trademark Owner in Good Faith |
| 错误内容 | |
| 正确说法 | |
| 提交 |
-
5分
共有0人评价过此文献,平均分为0分
最相关
- ·New Amendments of Chinese Trademark Law will Provide Stronger Protection to Trademark Owner in Good Faith
- ·An Analysis of the SPC Judgment on PRETUL
- ·A Global Perspective: Do Parallel Imports Constitute Trademark Infringement?
- ·Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
- ·Case report: How such a concealed infringement of UnionPay’s intellectual property was brought to justice in China?
- ·1st Civil Case Recognizing Well-known Trademark on Similar Goods
- ·2017 Typical Trademark Cases Released by the Supreme People’s Court of P.R.C
- ·A Case Study of VON DUTCH (Ⅱ)
- ·How to Handle Complex Disputes Between Registered Trademark and Well-known Trademark in China?
同作者
同机构
- ·Lift the veil of Sovereign Guarantee of Russia
- ·Decoding the New Rules for Online Food Trading
- ·Made in China? Financing Nigeria's infrastructure
- ·Copyright-related Rights in Sports
- ·Experience: A Patent Infringement Litigation in China
- ·Interregional Employment: Challenges revealed to“Social Insurance Paid Through a Third party”
- ·Suggestions on Employers’ Prudence about “Deemed as Voluntary Quit” Regulation
- ·Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
- ·Farewell to the Era of Case-by-Case Foreign Investment Approvals
- ·China’s International Taxation: Typical Practice
京公网安备 11010802021363号